Family Law Master Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Family Law hold in - Case Study ExampleShe moved out again in February 2006, and began to live with some other patch named Oliver since December, 2007. She has lived separately from her husband Michael for almost two years. She also does not bear a child in concern for emotional bond. Under the circumstances, Lucy is very right in considering that she should file for break under the protective covering of Law for her sanity and life.Under the Family Law Act 1996, she has three grounds for filing a postulation for divorce from Michael and achieve to get clean sh be in the division of property which has been established in the White v White 2001 1 AC 596 your Lordships House sought to assist assesss who have the difficult task of exercising the wide discretionary powers conferred on the court by Part II of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.1 In particular the House emphasized that in seeking a fair outcome there is no place for discrimination between a husband and wife and their single roles. Her first ground for divorce is adultery, in which she has e-mail proof of Michael being in relationship with another man, and thus morally violating his vow of conjugal union and social norm. She has personal proof of unreasonable behaviour and where she shag submit petition which can contain a series of allegations against her husbands unreasonable behaviour. This would be evaluated and considered by the judge as the basis of annulment of her marriage. She has been forced to move out of her home for a length of conviction on mutual consent and live with friends. She did make an attempt to come back and reconcile. Even afterward that, she had to finally decide to move in and live with another man Oliver and had lived with for almost two years. This proves that on deteriorating domestic circumstances she has been forced to live away from home, husband and marriage. She is right in considering legal divorce by petition from her husband so that she can take charge o f her life and finances to harbour herself.2 2. She has no income or capital. Michael is still living in the former matrimonial home, which is now worth 250,000 pounds. he is earning around 50,000 pounds pa. Michael bought some shares in his employers company whilst he and Lucy were still together. They have shot up in value and are now worth 100,000 pounds. Advise Lucy about the likely outcome of her application for adjuvant relief on divorce.Lucy should take pro-active measure once she has decided to get divorce from Michael on the pecuniary issues and getting a fair share of her asset from her matrimonial home in which her investment for the requital has been the primary source of the mortgage and the investment has doubled. This should be based on the principal of equal sharing in marriage which is considered the partnership of equals. This equal sharing principle derives from the basic concept of equality permeating a marriage as silent today. Marriage, it is often said, i s a partnership of equals. In 1992 Lord Keith of Kinkel approved Lord Emslies observation that husband and wife are now for all practical purposes equal partners in marriage R v R 1992 1