Evaluating the Effectiveness of Gun Buyback Programs Essay -- Gun Contr

Gun repurchase programs leave become a prosaic law enforcement practice since their creation in the 1970s. These buyback programs ar a method of proactive policing against poor boy crime and argon used as a mean by law enforcement in an effort to enclose gun military group. Generally, police offer incentives to community members in exchange for firearms. These incentives are most commonly m stary or gift certificates, but whitethorn also be merchandise. The programs rose to popularity in the 1990s due to general public support. However, as far as weapons policies go, gun buyback programs have been criticized as an ineffective means of curbing or preventing firearm force-out. Thus, one must ask does the purchase of firearms from private citizens by law enforcement conflict the rate of gun crime, or would other means be much effective in combating this type of crime?According to the journal of economics there are more firearms in the United States than people. Furthermor e, the majority of homicides are committed with a firearm (Levitt, 2004). This may indicate that the availability of firearms contributes to gun violence. Individuals acquire guns in a variety of ways, from inheritance, purchasing, or theft. Regardless of the means of attainment, the possession of firearms is widespread in the United States. Those who possess guns do so for many reasons such as for sport, protection, or illegal activities (Bilchik, 1999). Gun buyback programs receive weapons from all types of individuals, regardless of how they originally acquired their firearms or why. The first gun buyback program was employed in Baltimore in 1977 to curb violence perpetrated by the use of firearms (Carter, 2002). Over the course of three-months, over 13,000 firearms we... ...Retrieved from Senate website Cook, P. J., & Ludwig, J. (2000). Gun violence the real costs. New York, NY Oxford University Press.Levitt, S. D. (2004). Understanding why crime fell in the 1990s Four factors that explain the decline and six that do not. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1), 163-190. Retrieved from http//www.jstor.org/pss/3216880Orlean, S. (2012). Saturday night. New York, NY Simon & Schuster.Walker, S. (2008). Sense and nonsense about crime, drugs, and communities. Belmont, CA Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Wellford, C. F., Pepper, J. V., & Petrie, C. V. (2005). Firearms and violence. Washington, D.C. The internal Academies Press.