Nations and Nationalities in Europe

Rule by the people and for the people. This is a common phrase used by many an(prenominal) right away to describe thevariety of democratic political institutions found wholly oer the globe today. While nearly alldemocracies outside of atomic number 63 model the beginnings of their form of g all overnment to the UnitedStates and more specifically to the U.S. Constitution, for democracies within Europe, the beginningsare traced even farther back in time to marry deuce different traditions. One of these traditions beingness the English Constitution mainly involving the Magna Carta, and the other traditionrevolving around the French Revolution.In comparing these two as to which has ultimately proved stronger as the base for popular reign andwhy, one can discern that the French revolutionary tradition has courtly this for two drives.The first reason being due to the fact of it being more recent in historical context. Such an important effect having occurred less than 300 years ag o has more relevance in the minds of many politicalthinkers in our modern era than a resembling event which occurred nearly 800 years ago. Mankind tendsto believe that his ideas improve over time and thus the later the idea, the better the idea it is.The second reason for the French tradition being the base for nearly forms of popular dominate today is dueto it truly identifying and involving the three classes of the populace the aristocracy, middle-class,and poor, back consequently as it does today, in the political and economic process of society. While bothtraditions sought to limit the power of the monarch from being absolute over its subjects, it was theFrench revolution which gave a strong voice to those neither generous nor poor.The English tradition onthe other hand, primarily involved the aristocracy and the monarch, much like a dispute being settledtoday between the millionaires on one side and the billionaires on the other. Today, like in the late18th century during the time of the French revolution, in most advanced and developing democraticsocieties, the vast majority of the citizenry extraction in the middle.Thus, it is their political interests and perspectives which influence political discussion and change, just as it didnearly 300 years ago.