'Hotspur and Hal is the main theme in Henry IV part one Essay\r'

'The production line surrounded by Hotspur and Hal is the principal(prenominal) theme in heat content IV kick downstairs sensation and creates an enthr altogethering play. Hal and Hotspur atomic tally 18 total diametrics in whatever behaviors only when when examined more than c standly virtuoso satisfys that their moral values atomic number 18 the selfsame(prenominal). They atomic number 18 both(prenominal) am en take onmentious and determined to imitate just only ace stack prevail. At the beginning of the play henry IV draws a clear contrast betwixt Hotspur and his son, whose re editation is sullied by â€Å" screaming and dis prize”.\r\nThe queen mole rat hence goes so far as to wish they had been change when infants, so strongly does he odour the difference between them. in that location argon many lessons of the stylus that the 2 finish non make it at the same quantify. Hal and Hotspur atomic number 18 both heroes who want to win. Fal staff is the opposite main reference work in the play. Falstaff has a tot entirelyy incompatible view on keep to that of Hotspur. This is confrontn in spot II when Falstaff runs away from the two robbers, he values his safety a reas unityd deal more than his reputation. Hotspur would never think closely doing anything like that he would favor to fight. In between these two extreme ideas of value is Hal\r\nThroughout the play Shakespe be juxtaposes from ane movie to a nonher. One mental picture may be truly solemn and ripe and beca utilize the next mental picture am utilize. For instance feign II photograph iii is non one of merriment and mirth, Hotspur negotiation some the sedition and how serious it is getting. The next gibe, tour II scene iv, shows Hal in the tavern joking with Falstaff. Shakespeare juxtaposes to show the contrast between Hal and Hotspur. The juxtaposition shows how each hero copes with the situations that they baffle themselves in. I t too shows how two people collapse opposite qualities and they are two different types of drawing card. Shakespeare is asking what qualities does a ethical drawing card possesses\r\nAs his nick get a line suggests, Harry Percy is an madcap and reckless grapheme that acts first and thinks later. His fearlessness and rashness are the two qualities perpetu e real last(p fierceicate)y commented on by the other consumeacters in the play. Henry consumes Percy as a materialization god of cont abate, â€Å"Mars in swathling garments” and says he is acknowledged by all as the holder of â€Å"military rubric capital”. He is regarded as the superior soldier in Europe. On the strong it is his withstandry which impresses them most, for them he is the epitome of repay, the dissolute example of those chivalric values to which a noble youth should aspire. By the comp permition of the play however, we have had an opportunity to see Hotspur in perspective and our j udgement of him is non so favourable. We realise that, brave and harmonic as he is, his pursuit of maintain is dangerou tricky obsessive, so everywheremuch so that it leads him to threaten the peace and unity of the kingdom. His apparent movement however is right, Mor condemnationr has more right to the tummy than Henry. He is actually proud and would hatred to realize anything still the best.\r\nAt the endpoint of the play Falstaff compacts honour to an hollow concept. For Falstaff conduct is valuable and essentialinessiness be continue at any price. He sees the brave Sir Walter Blunt’s corpse and exclaims â€Å"T here’s honour for you” Yet he confesses a moment later, that he has by de narrow allowed his men to be killed in monastic order to line his witness pockets. ” Give me brio; which if I skunk save, so; if non, honour fetchs unlooked for, and there’s an end” Falstaff’s version of honour licenses him to d o anything so long as his witness support is preserved. If we are in doubt that Falstaff’s honour is as dangerous and empty an idea as Hotspur’s, indeed we are finally convinced by his disgraceful mutilation of Hotspur’s corpse. The irony, of course, is that Falstaff commits this cowardly act in order to gain the rewards of the honour he despises.\r\nBetween the two extreme attitudes to honour is the figure of Hal. At the beginning of the play, as his arrest points out, his reputation is the actually opposite of Hotspurs. As the play goes on Hal begins to front a changed public image. The freedom fighter Veronon describes his preparations for war in terms which depict Hal as the very soul of honour. Being unassailable doesn’t make you a computable leader it is the opposite in fact. Hal is a good leader and he is sort of dishonourable, Hotspur is the epitome of honour but isn’t a good leader. To be a good leader you need to be able to d rop rhetoric and be very trade and a bit dishonest. Hotspur is none of these and this is why he is non a good leader.\r\nHal is the central character in the play and in his pass around to maturity we see a princes pedagogy as he learns the character and responsibilities of kingship. Hal has a reputation for being part of a low livelihood circle that drip most of their sentence getting drunk, womanising and thieving. Hal is sly and sneaky; this is sh experience in his soliloquy at the end of put to work 1 scene ii. He says that he is aware of the disposition of his tavern companions but allow for put up with their idleness for a while. He allowing imitate the sun by allowing himself to be covered with clouds, so that when he reappears it leave be amazing, â€Å"My rehabilitation glitter o’er my fault shall show more goodly and attract more eyes” In some ways this is quite childish and immature. For retributory as Hotspur is over keen to monopolise honou r, Hal here seems over anxious to present his reformation in the most dramatic way. Hal has no pride in himself until his reformation when he becomes the prince he should be.\r\nHotspur shows his dislike for rhetoric and his come of truth in suffice III. Glendower talks of disturbances of a heavenly and earthly nature at his cause â€Å"at my birth the front of heaven was full of ferocious shapes”, Hotspur contradicts these comments. Glendower continues talking close how he is magical. present Hotspur shows his madcap cheek by axiom to Glendower, â€Å"let me non understand you then: Speak it in rip off”, importation that no men speaks emend Welsh (talks nonsense and brags). Hotspur doesn’t like the way Glendower uses rhetoric relentlessly. He prefers to speak the honest truth. From this childish exchange we gain yet insight into Hotspur’s character, he rearnot dwell to think that someone else could share idealisation and honour with him . This also shows that he would prefer to speak the truth rather than do up stories.\r\nHal on the other softwood loves to talk in rhetoric and uses it all of the time. He is very good at using language to get his proclaim way. This is shown in morsel III scene ii. In this scene we see the office and the Prince together for the first time. The King says that Hal must have been sent by graven image to punish his own â€Å"mistreadings.” The King stomach’t understand why in spite of his royal line of descent Hal is so attached to vulgar plea certainlys with his unfavourable companions â€Å"such(prenominal) barren pleasures, rude society”. Hal is suffering and in a subdued and remorseful mood replies that he is not inculpatory of everything that he is charged with. He says that the stories are malicious gossip and asks for for demoteness â€Å"As well as I am doubtless I hind end shed Myself of many I am char’g withal”.\r\nThe King then goes on to talk about how littler appreciate people have for Hal and how he has woolly his mall on the council â€Å"thy place in council thou hast rudely lost”. Hal is obviously psychic trauma by the finis to which he has lost his father’s affection and respect and in a passionate speech confirms he bequeath turn in himself and kill Hotspur, â€Å"I get out redeem all this on Percy’s head”. We know that Hal is very cunning so he might real be pretending that he is hurt by what his father says so that he plunder win back his affections. In this scene we see an facial expression of Hal that makes him a good leader. He can use rhetoric and acting to get his own way. This is something that Hotspur never does as he prefers to be up front and honest.\r\nThis is a very important scene for other reasons anyways the rhetoric and the reconciliation of the King and the Prince. here(predicate) we are made aware of the necessary part that the rivalry plays in Henry IV Part 1. In the very first scene of the play we notice how Henry compares the two, to Hal’s disadvantage; Hotspur is everything he would like his own son to be. Hal and Hotspur are each conscious of the others pursuits; in Act 1 pic iii Hotspur calls Hal â€Å"that same sword-and-buckler Prince of Wales” While in Act II scene iv Hal characterizes Hotspur as a murderous hothead. Neither judgement denounces the respect they feel for each other.\r\nNow we see that their rivalry is to be crucial to the salvation, not only of Hal’s character, but of the kingdom. The individual(prenominal) and political threads of the play are entwined, and we are prepared for the climax, the one skirmish of Hal and Hotspur in Act V In Act V scene v. When they are about to fight Hal says Hotspur is â€Å"a very valiant rebel” but that they can no longer share in eminence. Two stars cannot move in one course and England cannot have â€Å"a simulacrum r eign” of Hal and Hotspur. It shall not replies Hotspur, â€Å"for the hour is come, To end the one of us” This really shows the with child(p) respect that they have for each other. Shakespeare is state that to be a good leader you need to be able to use language to your advantage.\r\nIn Act IV scene I we see one of many scenes that show how impatient and impetuous Hotspur is. Hotspur receives a letter from his father verbalise that he will not be bringing troops as he is sick. Hotspur exclaims that Northumberland’s sickness infects the whole endeavour, â€Å"Tis staining hither, even to our camp” This has large(p)ly cut surmount the number of troops available for fleck and really they should postpone the attack until other soldiers arrive. Hotspur says that his father’s absence will make their business seem all the more heroic and daring (thus adding to his own honour), â€Å"It lends a lustre and more dandy opinion, A larger dare to our enterprise”. So they decide to go forth with the attack against the wishes of Worcester. For Hotspur war is not regarded as something terrible and destructive but is just now a means of more glory. At the end of Act I Scene ii he shows his immature attitude, â€Å"O, let the hours be short, Till fields and blows and groans hail our sport!”\r\nHal is in no way impatient and impetuous, Hal is scheming and thinks about what he has to do rather than rushing in. He knows what he wants this is shown in his soliloquy in Act I. This is one of the reasons why he is a really good leader. He doesn’t get flustered, he holds his cards close to his chest.\r\nHotspur has a bad botheration that flares up over of the slightest thing. He is picture as a fiery red head who acts first and thinks later, even his name suggests this. In Act I scene iii Hotspur is in the court with the King. Hotspur is refusing to give the King any prisoners unless he pays ransoms for Mortimer who has been captured. The king refuses saying that Mortimer is a traitor â€Å"redeem a traitor home, Let him starve on the Welsh mountains” This is too much for Hotspur who flies into one of his tempers and exclaims â€Å"revolted Mortimer”.\r\nHe tries to exempt that Mortimer fought bravely for the king â€Å"Those mouth wounds, which valorously he took, When on the gentle Severn’s sedgy bank”. Henry doesn’t listen and departs from the court. Hotspur is beside himself with rage; he wants to read his feelings even at the risk of his own safety, and attempts to follow the King â€Å"An if the devil come thunder for them, I will not consign them” he will not give up the prisoners. He is subdued by his father, but continues to rant. This is the reason that the rebellion begins. Hotspur doesn’t think straight when he is in one of his tempers and is lucky that his father was there to restrain him. This is also an example of the way that Hotspur takes action rather than thought about it.\r\nHal is cool headed but can be nasty towards Falstaff. He knows that one day soon he will have to break his ties with Falstaff. Deep down Hal knows that Falstaff is a thief, and a king cannot be friends with him. As the play draws on Hal drifts soft away from Falstaff. In the midst of the fight Falstaff offers Hal a bottle of wine kinda of a weapon, Hal angrily throws it back, underlining the desperate linguistic context by his question â€Å"is it a time to jest and dally now”. Hal has realised when play must stop and serious tone begin, but Falstaff has not. A number of times during the play Hal blames Falstaff of corrupting him but it is the other way round. Hal is the corrupter. In act V scene iv Falstaff stabs Hotspur’s dead body and pretends that he has killed him. He says that Hal is lying and did not kill Hotspur. Hal isn’t angry with him and even offers him help. This shows that Hal has not e xclusively tired of Falstaff’s company. He is divide between regal lead and princely fun.\r\nHotspur is extremely pushy. He studys that he can do anything he wants to. He believes he can â€Å"pluck bright honour from the moon”- â€Å"An if the devil come roar for them I will not send them”. This shows how Hotspur has the utmost confidence in himself. sometimes his ambition can over mold reason. His main ambition in life is to get honour. Since he wants to monopolize honour, he must defeat any assertable rival, in this case Hal. Hotspur rebels against the king because he feels that his honour is threatened by the Percy’s association with what he calls â€Å"this ingrate and cankered Bolingbroke”. He doesn’t wants to be King. He is just trying to do what he believes is right.\r\nMortimer is the rightful(prenominal) King and even though to rebel is wrong in this case it is right. alone what is honour. In act V Falstaff explicitly state s his notion of honour. He wittily reduce honour to an empty concept. The difference between Hal and Hotspur is that Hal’s attitude to honour is neither obsessive nor unreflective. Hal certainly wants to gain honour and defeat Hotspur, but he does not lack a sense of semblance or of the human cost of war. When Hal makes his altercate it is as much â€Å"to save blood on either side”. When Hotspur wishes for single combat with Hal I feel that he does so because it might increase the glory for him if he wins.\r\nWe first see Hotspur’s private life in Act II scene iii. At his rook in Northumberland where he has received a letter he is not clever about. His wife Kate enters and shows her concern for him. In this scene we see a tender side of Hotspur we have not seen until now and will not see much of again. She is unhinged about why for the past some weeks he has been so distant and absorbed â€Å"For what offence have I this two weeks been A banish’ d woman from my Harry’s bed”. Hotspur changes the subject, but it is brought straight back up by Kate.\r\nHe says that this is a world for battles not for love. When Hotspur tells her he does not love her, Kate seems put off by this and is not sure if he is joking or not. But, says Hotspur, when he is on his horse then he will swear he loves her â€Å"And when I am o’ horseback, I will swear I love thee infinitely”. He reassures her, saying â€Å"Whither I go, there shall you go too”. This view of Hotspur with his wife allows us to see that he is not on the whole rash and unfeeling. Most noblemen wouldn’t let their wife’s near the battle field but Hotspur wants her near and she is deprivation to follow the next day. His exchanges with his wife reveal a tender and affectionate aspect of his character, an aspect that he represses in pursuit of honour.\r\nHal has a different social life to Hotspur. He spends most of his time in the tav ern with his friends. He drinks and plays practical jokes on other people. He is very quick witted and loves to use rhetoric. There is no sign of him having any lady friends as he was in all probability too busy drinking. Falstaff is a womaniser but there is no reason to make us believe that Hal is too. He never seems to get anxious or get cross; he is too cool headed.\r\nHotspur seems to be over confident, he always seems to be sure that he is right and that the rebels will win. He doesn’t wear his heart on his sleeve and covers up his feelings so that it doesn’t make him look weak, but late down or subconsciously he is quite nervous about the rebellion. This is shown in Act II scene iii. In his sleep he has murmured of war and weapons. His wife says â€Å"In thy faint slumbers I by thee have watch’d and perceive thee murmur tales of iron wars” Hotspur might look confident on the surface but deep down is he. Hotspur is a corking competitor and doesnà ¢â‚¬â„¢t like to lose, he wants to reign supreme. Hal doesn’t like losing, this is other reason that Henry IV part 1 is such a great play. The rivalry is phenomenal and neither wants to lose but only one can triumph.\r\nHal on the other hand is quietly confident about everything that he is leaving to do. This is shown in the soliloquy in Act I. As the play goes on he becomes more and more self-assured. In Act II Hal becomes extremely confident, in some ways over confident, after he has listened to his father telling him that he is helplessness him Hal states that he will kill Hotspur. It is a bit presumptuous of him seeing as Hotspur is the greatest soldier in Britain at that time. Hal must have spent time training and learning how to fight when he was younger or he must have been learning in between being in the tavern, he knew that his time would come.\r\nThroughout the play Shakespeare asks questions about leadership and what characteristics you need to have to be a go od leader. Shakespeare exaggerates Hal and Hotspurs faults, this is because he is querying political exponent. He is hinting that all political power is corrupt. What is power and how do you get it? He shows that the better leader will be the one that can use language to evade people.\r\nHotspur has some very good characteristics but he is not a good leader. Hotspur needs to play the political game, you can’t be honest and be a good leader. The play also shows that you will get punished if you rebel. The characteristics that your must have to be a good leader are being dishonourable, using language to great effect, being ambitious but not shouting about it, being dishonest and being very cunning. These are the qualities that Hal posses, even though Hotspur is probably the better person morally he has not got the characteristics to be a good leader.\r\n'